xxxworldofporn.com

Originally by “The Washington Times” written by Valerie Richardson and edited and rewritten by Jade

Looks like the pro-lifer’s might have a legitimate bitch […] you might be rubbing this all-over your face? Alright-alright—I’ll tell you: “skin-cell proteins are being farmed from aborted fetus’s.”

So the “Children of God for Life” are freaking the fuck out […] and I can’t blame them: “can you?” This group monitor’s the use of fetal material–“laymen terms {dead baby!},” this group has called for a boycott of all facial and skin treatments that are manufactured by Neocutis Inc.

Can you believe that there was a mad scientist somewhere in the world whom said: “Ya, maybe that aborted-fetus could be used as an anti-aging ingredient.” Quick wash that shit off our face! Oh my God—that’s disgusting! And in reality an “aborted boy” was used as this anti-aging creams main ingredient. Ahhh!

The group says and I personally stand with them on this issue: “There’s no excuse for using aborted babies in skin care product’s.” Some “rich” and “aging-woman” somewhere is asking: “but does it work?” I personally discussed this with one of my customers at a booby-bar whom told me—“well if it works?” Oh my God that’s disgusting on so-many-levels!

Actually the reaction of “shock” and “disgust” one of the members of the “Children of God for Life” said: “she could not believe the shock and anger that she’s seen.”

Get out the pitchforks and torches—for those “aging women” whom are knowingly using a product—that’s main ingredient is [dead baby]. We could have them running like Frankenstein’s to the only windmill in town—while the town’s people run after them.

In a statement released Oct 30th in response to a wave on condemnation […] meaning yelling and screaming […] “that’s disgusting, I’ve been rubbing dead baby on my face!” All the real hate comes from pro-lifers and religious blogs, and yes “me!” Yes I have a problem with “unknowingly” or “knowingly” rubbing an aborted fetus all over my face—wouldn’t you?

Well Neocutis is defending using its trademarked main ingredient—the processed skin cell proteins […] from “aborted fetuses” AKA [dead baby’s]. Their argument is that—“our fetal-cell-line was harvested in a responsible manner.” But they’re missing the point […] that’s “DISGUSTING!” They’re claiming that this treatment is used for treating severe dermatological injuries—but it also works great for wrinkles. Ahhh!

The researchers at that company have compared themselves with the researchers whom developed the Polio-vaccine, because they used “fetal kidney cells” to come up with that vaccine. “Um, with one difference guys—Polio could and can kill people—has anyone ever heard of people dying from winkles? What I mean is–no one has ever died from having too many wrinkles!”

The Mad Scientist’s at the University-of-Lausanne in Switzerland—came up with the anti aging—lets help people with bad skin cream, which worked better on aging-wrinkled-skin as an anti-aging cream than anything else, and they used a 14-week-aborted-male-fetus whom had been electively-aborted at the Swiss University.

They say the abortion was necessary because the baby could not survive to term […] BLAH-HA-HA–“so let’s use his severed-parts in an anti-aging-cream?”

That’s DISGUSTING!

Neocutis said because it was an “ethical cause” to use an aborted fetus—on what would become an anti-aging-cream, and because the fetus wouldn’t have survived to term anyway—that they’d use his little-fetus-body in their anti-aging-cream?”

That’s DISGUSTING!

Neocutis claims they didn’t use this fetus’s “whole body”—they only used a “little piece of skin” […] the size of a postage-stamp, (it doesn’t matter–that’s like a Cannibal saying, “I didn’t eat his whole leg—I only had a little bit of it—it doesn’t mater how little the piece of skin was! It’s still “gross!”) And because the hospital’s ethics-committee said it was in accordance with Swiss law—“it must be OK? RIGHT?”

Now Neocutis say’s that—“we don’t know how long the cell-line will last?” But they said that—“no additional fetal-biopsies will ever be required.” Isn’t that like a cannibal who promises that I will never eat another person again!” Do you believe Neocutis […] I don’t!

Neocutis President Mark J. Lemko said—“We feel we are in complete-compliance with the laws of God and the laws of man!” Well, I don’t–because that’s “disgusting!” The mere thought of “using” or “rubbing” dead baby skin [from an aborted fetus’s] cells all over my face, which will be absorbed, threw my skin and into my blood stream—makes me want to start rubbing Olive Oil on my face.

The company originally invented the cream which is called “anti-aging-cream” for uses for skin-ulcers, burns and scarring—but they realized that their creams, (special “INGREDIENT” of “DEAD BABY” or “FETUS”, worked better in “restoring” aging-skin.)

Their products include—quick, go running to your beauty-table, and throw these out—“Bio-Restorative skin Cream, Bio-Gel, Bio-Restorative Eye Cream, and Bio Restorative Serum with PSP Intensive Spot Treatment. These products are expensive they cost $120 per ounce, (that’s a lot of cash, for something that’s main ingredient is an ABORTED FETUS.) Doesn’t smothering cream with aborted fetus in it, all over your face—seem “so-good?” Not! Ahh! I think […] I threw up a little.

Judie Brown the President of the American Life League said: “although use of aborted fetal parts is indefensible for any purpose, Neocutis’ use for a product as TRIVIAL as an ‘anti-aging-cream’ speaks uniquely to our current trends, and the desire for eternal youth at any price.” But my question is: “if you knew being a cannibal would keep you looking 20 something—would you become a cannibal and eat someone?”

She goes on to say: “what’s new about this, is our cultural attitude toward beautification and our sense of self […] and living forever.” (Well, I for one, don’t care about youth, if I have to rub-aborted-fetus skin cells on my face […] I believe a lot of women would not want too use this product–if they “knew” or “were told” what the main ingredient was.

She says she’d object to the use of fetal-cell-lines no-matter what their use—so would I! For either medical or cosmetic purposes, she argues that mature cells are just as effective as aborted fetus cells. I guess? Personally, I believe we need to respect the dead—and not use someone’s “friend” or “relative” for any purpose—unless they said that their body could be used for that sole-purpose.

A lot of other companies that make high-end skin creams, use proteins derived form Postnatal Placentas—“that’s GROSS!”

I don’t care how refined they are—has anyone ever seen a Placenta?

That’s one of the most disgusting things that I’ve ever heard of! So there’s a Mad Scientist somewhere in the world—holding a bag of Baby-Placentas, who’s standing over a Large-Cream-Vat […] then he throw’s the bag of placentas into a large VAT of cream—“THAT’S DISGUSTING!”

Mrs. Brown believes that type of use—to be completely moral—I find it too be completely DISGUSTING!

OK—I’m going to be like a “Follow Your Heart Vegan” in the “produce section” with regards too buying anti-aging-creams […] I will not use any product’s with any kind of “human”—“baby”—or “fetus” ingredients in it. And “NO” I don’t care if using those part’s, are MORAL or NOT […] I don’t want to touch–much less rub something from some strange-vagina on my face. Would you?

Even so Mrs. Vinnidge said: “using fetal tissue in anti-wrinkle cream crosses moral and ethical boundaries.

This is pure vanity: “we’re talking about a medical treatment.” She compared it to the Nazis’ purported use of the skin of Jews to make lampshades. I have to agree with her […] it’s just not right!

The Catholics web site showed a clip from the 1973 science-fiction movie “Soylent Green” where the “secret ingredient” in the popular wafer is found to be human-flesh. Does it really matter whether you eat the “flesh” or rub it on your “face?”

A 14-week-old-fetus is tiny and a stamp-sized sample of skin—could be that whole fetus’s back. Mrs. Vinnedge said.

The Neocutis web site does not hide their main-ingredient (aborted-fetus-skin-cells which is on their web-site)—which is in their product lines. Their ad says: “inspired by fetal skin cells to obtain an optimal naturally balanced mixture of skin nutrient’s”

Even the Neocutis critics couldn’t understand, and were baffled by the companies candor. The reason that Mrs. Vinnedge could never confirm the use of aborted-fetus-cells in facial cream lines—was because the “Food and Drug Administration,” does not require the listing of cosmetic ingredient’s.

WOW! That’s really disturbing: “Soylent Green is a reality in 2010.”

The Neocutis Ad says: “Neocutis means, laterally new skin. And who wouldn’t like to turn back time to recreate flawless baby skin again?” BLAH-HA-HA! The Evil Scientists said, while rubbing his hands together—“I’ll make millions!” Mrs. Vinnidge says: “she can’t believe that [Neocutis] posted their main ingredient.”

Many companies think—“Is there a good to be achieved”, and don’t care how.

Mrs. Vinnidge said and that she’s not “surprised” by this, because her group published a book in 1981 called, “101 Uses For a Dead Baby.” Olga Fairfax wrote that fetal-tissue could be used for skin-care products, and even to grow new-limbs. It looks like we’re more advanced than [Mrs. Fairfax] could have ever have imagined […] but at what cost?

The dead need to be “protected” from these facial-cosmetic-harvesters.

I believe congress needs to get off their ass, and make labeling required on face creams, so I and the rest of the world, don’t rub “dead baby” all over our faces […] if we don’t want too–I know I don’t!

Originally posted by Shelly Lubben on lukeisback.com rewritten by Jade

I’ve often wondered–what makes a “real” friend? The type of person who honestly wants too help you, and isn’t just looking to line their own pockets from your abuse or destruction […] not that I have made many “REAL” friends, while I have been associated with the XXX industry.

Is friendship the same type of thing […] many would say–that a non-profit charity is? Which is an organization that needs that same type of friendship–between the founder and the supposed victims […] whomever those victims, might be […] or whatever their victimization might have been?

What I mean is, many people in need—like many people whom need people as friends, don’t need PHONIES claiming to offer them some pretend-type of help […] they need “REAL-PEOPLE” who really want too help them. Not people who are only looking for FAME for their PHONY ORGANIZATIONS and to promote their own names.

I say Shelly Lubben has got-to be the most overrated […] woman in porn—who claims: that her motivation for everything is to help those, {POOR-PORN-STARS}, please!

Most if not all Porn-Stars are “complete” and “utter bullshit” and get what they deserve […] I wouldn’t say it if it wasn’t true. They love gossip—hurting their friends—they don’t care what they say to whom, or how much they hurt that person. So why should “anybody” give any money too anyone who might be like this?

Redemption and forgiveness […] is earned! A lot of people not just “PORN-STARS” are hurting right now, and some are even “living” and “sleeping” in their cars or on the streets in L.A, these days and nights —“so why are Porn Stars life’s worth saving–if they can’t or won’t save themselves?

Shelly Lubben and the Pink Cross Charity, call’s these former XXX performers [PRECIOUS] and that they need help rebuilding their life’s—Shelly […] You can’t rebuild something you never had to begin with! Some of these so called “tragic X porn stars” would rather not share their heartache—with us the world. Why? Shouldn’t it be “mandatory” if you want your “LIFE-CHANGED” threw our donations […] that you need to tell us: AKA–the World–your story? That is, if you had any kind of a life to begin with?

Even in the 2nd paragraph she uses the words [PRECIOUS MEN AND WOMEN]—Shelly no one has been “molested” or “raped” and no-one held a “gun” to anyone’s head to perform in porn!

I understand “molested-children”—I understand “abducted-children”—I understand “battered-women”—I understand “sexual-slavery”. I do not understand the poor-poor- porn star (attitude) that some XXX performers have or had […] the I decided to do something, I knew was wrong, which might hurt my life in the future forever—so now that I don’t make porn anymore–everybody should feel sorry for me […] or help me?

Shelly posts her story on another giant phony’s porn news site: Cindi who ran this blog-post-scheme, on her site lukeisback.com […] a scheme, to make people give up their hard-earned-cash in the middle of a recession, when people are being laid off daily–for a phony-cause […] with Cindi’s giant-phony-posters pushing for her phony cause.

If the Pink Cross Foundation is real?

I want to see some documentation […] some numbers, something—to prove Shelly Lubben is not spending all of the donations, which might be providing her with a non-porn-star life style.

Show me some proof?

And I will post it on the XXX World of Porn—I need names, some numbers—who’s been helped, and how much money was given to the people the Pink Cross Charity has helped. Yes […] I need a report—why?

Because people—especially porn people […] LIE!

These out of work bum’s or Shelly’s friends–need Target-Cards, new clothes, baby needs, household supplies, books, bibles and “lots of resources” to recover from the horrible world, which forced them to make porn […] an industry that took their failing life’s, and made them the “failures” that they “obviously” already where. Oh, and if you don’t need your car or property […] you could also donate those things to an out of work bum whom might be Shelly’s friend–who likes feeling sorry for themselves.

No one in this “world” should be entitled to get money and things–without having too work for them! (And having made porn, does not entitle you to a “care-free” life after porn—GET A JOB–IF YOU DON’T LIKE OR WANT TO MAKE PORN and WANT YOUR LIFE TO CHANGE!)

I should know, I come from the worst situation possible, I was physically and mentally abused for 7 yrs 15 years ago, and had an 8 year restraining order against this monster—that’s “REAL” […] someone I loved, tried to kill me—but did I die? NO! Did I need Shelly Lubben’s or anyone elses help? NO! Am I still alive? YES! Did my perpetrator destroy my life? NO! Did I raise and support my son by myself? YES! DID I NEED ANYONE’S HELP? Yes, my family and my friends and I still do—but I like everyone else in the world needs those friends to be “REAL!”

I know that a lot of people who make porn—don’t have “family” or “friends,” mainly because most of them, have “burned” everybody close to them […] well if you don’t have either “FRIENDS or FAMILY” you had better work on your people skills—and get some!

As for people feeling “sorry for themselves” and not trying to make their life’s better by working to achieve those goals by themselves, and for themselves […] well I don’t contribute to that type of pity-party.

Shelly claims–that she has helped “thousands” of men and women every year. Who are these men and women?

If she’s going to ask us to donate to the “wretches of society,” whom are too pathetic to help themselves […] the least she could do—is provide us with a list of those “thousands of names,” she claims that she has helped […] if they “really exist?”

Something she says she does throughout the year?

Her Pink Cross Charity claims to have helped “hundreds” as Shelley said, or was that thousands […] which was it? “hundreds-or-thousands?” You can’t be helping “thousands” leave the XXX industry–while at the same time you’re helping “hundreds” to leave the same industry […] do I detect a lie?

She has a “unique” and “important mission” by helping her to reach out […] while helping “herself” to promote her own name […] those PRECIOUS MEN AND WOMEN are only an after thought—so Shelly can promote her “name”, while giving the XXX industry a bad-name […] because a few “LOSSERS” couldn’t do a job—that they should not have been doing in the first place!

Who are those men and women she’s talking about?

Are they her “personal friends?”

Shelly’s mission is too save the “wretches of the porn world industry” […] and that her mission can’t happen without “OUR” support?

But we should all have a “HEART” and “INVEST” in these “BEAUTIFUL LIVES” that she keeps referring too […] weren’t they beautiful before they started making porn? Or did that only happen–after they were supposedly “defiled” by the big-bad-filthy-XXX industry?

My take on the whole Pink Cross Charity […] I don’t care about most porn-stars, or what happens to them—most, but not all are horrible people—who deserve whatever happens to them!

I do have a heart—I just keep my feelings in check with reality. The reality is that most porn stars—but not all–are not the type of people, which I generally feel like helping. To me, help and sympathy […] need to be real […] so I don’t give to causes that I don’t believe in. Giving should come from the heart, and no one should make other people do what they personally believe too be right—that person should do it from their own heart. That’s why I believe most charity’s suck!