Posted by Sammy at 10 March 2010

Category: News

Tags: , , , ,

Written by Jade at the XXX World Of Porn

Jeff Mullen claims that he should be able to pay less than LA Directs minimum modeling fees on shoot’s, because he gives the talent whom star on his shoot’s which are made by a porn company called x-play. The reason that Jeff Mullen claims he need’s to pay the talent 300 dollars less then their minimum fee of 800 dollars, is because the XXX industry is in the financial shitter […], but isn’t Jeff Mullen’s XXX films – award winning films, and shouldn’t Jeff Mullen be making more money and be able to pay his talent?

This is total bullshit and the only [real] reason that Jeff Mullen who’s made [his] award winning porn parodies doesn’t want to pay Derek Hay with LA Directs modeling fee’s, which is the performers normal rates – is because Jeff Mullen is a cheap-skate! He actually believes that the talent would rather have red-carpet-events and their pictures taken by some creepy porn Paparazzi “or” be able to say that they won a award, because they stared in a Jeff Mullen XXX movie. In his delusional mind Jeff Mullen believes that the XXX performers would rather have all of that then to be paid the money that is owed to them – for their hard work on his lame but [award winning XXX films] – shame on you Mr. Mullen!

Jeff Mullen whom is such a great porn parody director – which is a matter of opinion? Did he only cheapen some of America’s greatest TV shows? You be the judge. My opinion is that porn is [not] cheap for the talent to make, first there’s a $125 dollar HIV test that talent has to have every 4 weeks – you’ll be providing your own wardrobe and lingerie, shoes, and all of the accessories and you know Mr. Mullen probably is too cheap to hire a make-up-artist – so you’ll probably be providing your own makeup as well – with all of the expenses, the shoot might wind up costing you anywhere between $100 – $300 dollars […] depending on what the director wants you to bring to the shoot. But what a close friend of mine recognized was that the cheaper director’s – wanted her to come to their sets with the most stuff – paying their talent only enough to cover the expenses of wardrobe “or” tests. And they’re the ones whom are the cheapest and they’ll be the one’s to bitch about what wardrobe the talent did show up with. She said they’re the ones that always want you to have a lot of different colored clothes, and matching bra and underwear sets […], which are not cheap. Many cheap directors do not care about that because they believe that the talent is lucky to be working for them at all?

The cheap Director’s want big names for rock-bottom prices, so they can pocket all the extra cash – probably to finance their rented houses “or” drug habits – who knows why they’re so cheap? I’d like to ask Jeff Mullen (who’s such a great guy?) why should the talent put forth any effort in his films “if” they’re not going to receive even their minimum rate? Knowing that most porn films – even Mr. Mullen’s only have a shelf life of 6 months or less. Even the awards and the people who won those awards will be forgotten weeks after receiving those awards […], and if said awards don’t raise a performer’s pay [???] than do those awards even matter Mr. Mullen?

So what if a performer wins a heavy dust collecting award “if” they can’t at the end of the month pay their rent?

I do believe that Derek Hay is right about what he said in a recent post that’s posted on lukeisback.com […] he run’s a business – and is only asking for the performer’s minimum fee for the scene “and” if Jeff Mullen doesn’t like it, then Jeff Mullen can go to other agency’s “and” try to low-ball their talent!

XXX performers need to stop selling themselves short. Don’t listen to an over-aged, cheap, sleazy porn producers […] that tell you “if” you are in one of his production’s that you could win awards “and” this will launch your career, and boost your name – so you’ll be working more. Make sure you get what you deserve, for putting your image on film for the rest of your life because working in the XXX industry only matters if your getting paid – fuck red carpet events pictures and awards! Make sure you get what you deserve […] especially knowing that those XXX films will be out there long after your dead.

Sources Wikipedia written by Jade

It’s cold as hell in my little bluish-green room the heat’s on and it’s still cold. I got rid of the flu – but it’s making a second appearance “or” it’s my heart? Well, thanks to not having insurance – I’m waiting last minute to make a decision. My driver’s giving me shit – saying: “you could have a stroke – blah – blah – blah.” I still think it’s the flu – I could be wrong?

Anyway, I’m hearing that a lot of American’s hate the XXX industry […] at least the fanatics do. Porn also has fanatics – go read the Colonel’s writing on lukeisback.com to see a fanatic ramble. Fanatics who think and judge something to be wrong, but don’t give anyone any prove. Oh see, it’s the HIV that makes porn bad [???] the fanatics will tell you. A lot of people in Africa have HIV “and” AID’S – they’re not making adult videos. And the only reason that people are having a problem with the HIV controversy is because it’s a sexually transmitted disease, plus porn involves the taboo subject of […] sex.

I want to give my fanatical – ramblings a try […] I’ll try to compete with the HIV bone-heads in the world – so here it goes: yes HIV and AID’S are horrible diseases, but is sex on film any worse than movies like SAW “or” the Texas Chainsaw Massacre? These are the make believe representations of bloody, gory murders, cannibalism and amputations – one scene from the Texas Chainsaw Massacre the beginning in a scene shows a [monster] dragging a woman across the front yard then throwing her on a bed – latter at dinner she tries to eat and when she open’s her mouth you see a toothless grin because this [monster] removed all her teeth with a pair of pliers. That’s some sick-ass-shit! But that’s OK because there was [no sex] involved? But if there would have been an HIV threat on that movie set […] that same scene would not have been OK with the people whom had been watching that movie “or” with the HIV fanatics in the world?

Excuse me […] I’m going to ask America and the world is it more important to protect ours and the world’s citizen’s from promoting these types of horror/murder movies that promote brutality against innocent people? Rather than promoting future [monster’s] from reenacting scenes in these types of movies […] that some copy cat killer’s might actually get some of their ideas from.

Look, I know that some forms of porn, like some forms of Hollywood films are not right for [any] viewing audience. Why? These films promote violence against women and others…

But to say that condom’s will make the XXX industry safe from a disease whose virus is smaller than the microscopic tears in those condoms – is beyond retarded!

Look, just because Brandon Lee accidentally killed himself during the making of a martial arts film, which the stunt team had neglected to consider that the primer in the bullet was still live, and if fired could still produce enough force to push the bullet off the end of the cartridge. The primer provided just enough force to push the bullet out of the cartridge and into the barrel of the revolver so the bullet had enough force and that bullet killed Lee, (sources Wikipedia) […] that does not mean that if you took every real bullet off every set that that same thing couldn’t happen again on a Hollywood movie set – because it could…

No one ever talks about all the stunt men in Hollywood whom have been killed, during the productions of those action film’s that we all love watching. Well I know about their untimely deaths, and I believe from what my friend told me […] in one action movie 4 stunt men where killed during that movies production. Those movies stunt men didn’t have 10 year’s to prepare for their deaths – they died during the production of those films “and” died doing what they love doing…

But no one ever talk’s about stunt men dying in films – at least not to the same extent that they talk about HIV in porn […] why?

Because those deaths didn’t involve AID’S which is a disease “and” not an accident. Or is it? It’s not as if when your doing stunt’s or having sex – that you’re planning to die [???] so actually testing positive for HIV is an accident – just like the accident’s that happen during the filming of stunts in action films. But because in bible thumper’s minds those action films are morally OK ‘or” maybe Hollywood’s VIP’S are really good at keeping the death toll’s during the production of action films […] hush, hush?

Anything can happen in life – no one expected The Crocodile Hunter Stephen Robert Irwin whom died on September 4th 2006 to be pieced in the chest by a stingray barb while filming in Australia’s Great Barrier Reef which killed him, (wikipedia) […] but you won’t see any groups saying let’s make all wild life television personalities wear bullet proof vests? To protect them from those deadly stingray attacks…

Here’s the thing murder “and” violence has become acceptable in society, and has always been humanity’s escape from stress. Yes that’s disgusting […] remember the Gladiator’s in ancient Rome “or” the man-eating tigers from Roman history? What fun […] as long as you’re not the victim? Violence has become an acceptable part of the way humanity entertains itself – but porn and sex or sexual preferences are still for many people in society taboo. Why?

There are people in this world who believe that blowing themselves up and taking as many life’s with them is the way to get into heaven – but these same idiot’s believe people whom make porn “or” have different sexual preferences should be killed? Are we living in back in the Dark Ages?

The Black Death was one of the deadliest pandemics in human history, peaking in Europe between 1348 and 1350 and killed 30% to 60% of Europe’s population (wikipedia) […] there wasn’t porn back then – they just blamed the Jews for “supposedly” poisoning their wells and that was one of the possible reasons for the plague’s emergence […] there were many attacks against Jewish communities so in August of 1349 the citizens of Strasbourg murdered 2,000 Jews (wikipedia) – those groups where called angry mob’s – now their just called activists.

Bringing in the use of condom’s on XXX Porn Sets will never protect anyone 100% against any virus that causes the disease known as AID’S – any [action film] wither it’s a performer performing a dangerous sex act “or” it’s a Hollywood movies stunt-man performing a stunt, these people will continually put their life’s at risk because they love their jobs “and” like everyone else need to pay their bills. These people realize that there will always be a certain amount of risk regarding the production of these types of films, but because they love their craft they’ll continue to make those dangerous films. And if making these films is their passion’s why shouldn’t they be allowed to?

Yes, you can be more careful but you can’t always prevent diseases “or” death!

Now the fanatics really, really, really need to go after Hollywood for some of the gruesome and gorrish film’s that they produce, which is thrown out for the world to watch so that the next Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer won’t happen again “and” these same fanatics should leave the XXX industry alone and move on to other more important issues in the world.

Posted by Sammy at 5 March 2010

Category: Uncategorized

  • This is dedicated to Ryan Knox, Mike Hash, Jeremy Steele, and all the other people who think I care about what you do “or” don’t think about me! Which I don’t….